Not much I can add to this. I stil think readability is vital to a good book.
Originally posted 16.10.11
I read this article on the BBC website about a new literature award to rival the Booker.
The reason for the new award is the Booker’s supposed requirement for ‘a notion of readability’.
Now I know I am new to all this, but surely the minimum requirement of any good book, let alone a prize winning example, is that you can read it?
It’s probably just me.